Author: Tom Kerrigan
Date: 19:42:09 03/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 19, 2003 at 13:55:12, Robert Hyatt wrote: >a couple of journal papers behind it giving the details. 66.2 seems wrong, as I >mentioned, >because the Cray T90 can't break 100ns. And they are _known_ for memory speed >bandwidth and no cache. Uhm, "memory speed bandwidth"? Aren't we talking about memory latency? -Tom
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.