Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 08:52:24 03/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2003 at 10:38:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 20, 2003 at 08:27:00, george wrote: > >>ive got this by e-mail and i think i will keep it..... >> >> >>>Two and a half years ago -this is when the United States decided to invade Afganistan- I realised that there is absolutely no way that this decision could be reversed; even if one billion citizens demonstrated against it all over the world. >> >>This was the first time that I realised how insignificant my opinion and my >>actual life were, not only for the global and national 'society' to which I >>belong, but also for my own life and my immediate environment. I realised that >>even if I actually agreed with the punishment of those responsible, I still >>could not protect myself and my immediate environment from the side effects of >>such a war. Side effects upon the air that I inhale and the climatic pollution >>due to bombing. Side effects due to the permanent disastrous effects to the >>planet itself and -last but not least- actual damage in my general welfare. > >I think this is all funny. All the anti-war folks were saying "there is no >evidence Iraq has illegal weapons." Today he fired four of those Scud missles >that he didn't have. There is no evidence Saddam has any *more* illegal weapons. http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/030123/brookins.jpg > >:) > >This probably won't last as long as the last World Cup soccer match. >> >>However, there is a minimum personal free choice that I did have! This was to >>refuse to sponsor -or simply pay- those who I considered to be really >>responsible for all this. In a very indirect and minimum way! I therefore >>refused to consume any North American products, or even products which were >>related to American companies. I didn't consider this personal stance as the >>beginning of a new crusade. It could potentially grow to become one. But until >>that moment in time, I have been getting the personal satisfaction that my >>opposition had also a practical meaning. >> >>Now, once again, humanity is watching a similar 'play' which takes place despite >>the emense public opposition. I invite everyone to start together a minimun >>personal campaign that is not only a message to those who are about to start >>this new war. Furthermore, it is a campaign which offers the satisfaction of >>doing something practical about it! Between the 20th and the 30th of March lets >>not consume ANY American products. The maximun that could be gained out of such >>an effort is that at least 10 million people worldwide can deprive the American >>economy of $2,5 for 10 consecutive days. (This adds up to $250.000.000 -assuming >>that this is how much a packet of American cigarettes and a can of coca cola >>would cost)! The minimum that can certainly be gained is the personal >>satisfaction of actually doing something! >> >>You can therefore start a personal embargo to as many American products as you >>can. Stop consuming them or substitute them with European, Asian, or simply >>national and/or local products! Anyway, most of the time local or national >>products are healthier, are aesthetically more attractive(!), and they help >>local economies! >> >>How can one start? First of all sending this mail to as many contacts as they >>can. If this e-mail is sent to a minimum of 5 people from every recipient, then >>-at least in theory- within 10 days, a maximum of 9.765.625 people will have it >>in their mailbox. I m only saying this to emphasize the potential of such a >>move. Even if you cannot resist to the magic of American products but you agree >>with this move, at least send it to as many as you can. Others may be able to >>resist consuming them! >> >>YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT, BUT YOU ALSO DO HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK UP >>FOR YOUR RIGHTS AND BE HEARD! AS A CITIZEN OF THE WORLD!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.