Author: William H Rogers
Date: 09:05:41 03/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2003 at 11:20:25, Johan Hutting wrote: >On March 20, 2003 at 10:38:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I think this is all funny. All the anti-war folks were saying "there is no >>evidence Iraq has illegal weapons." Today he fired four of those Scud missles >>that he didn't have. >> >>:) > >Could you supply a source stating those SCUDs were illegal? > >Most 'anti-war' folks here aren't against a war. They're against the US >attacking Iraq without a UN-mandate, which is partially caused by using poor >excuses (such as the one above, al-quada ties, yadda yadda yadda "Iraq BAAAAAAD, >USA GOOOOOOOOD"). Approving the Scheveningen Invasion Act doesn't help much >either. Saddam was denied the weapons that could be fired at a range of over 90 miles. The Scuds were proven to have a range of over 1,000 miles as he used them against Isreal during the last war. What more proof do you want? Bill
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.