Author: Ed Panek
Date: 10:22:25 03/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 20, 2003 at 13:06:53, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On March 20, 2003 at 11:55:06, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>On March 20, 2003 at 10:38:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>I think this is all funny. All the anti-war folks were saying "there is no >>>evidence Iraq has illegal weapons." Today he fired four of those Scud missles >>>that he didn't have. >> >> >>So you are *not* anti-war, Bob? Your statement here is exactly what I have >>against the American way of 'solving problems': Sheer arrogance, no respect for >>people who think differently, the only solution being 'fighting voilence with >>violence', acting like the police officer of the world. > >I am _always_ "anti-war". And "anti-violence". But unfortunately, at some >point in time >you have to stop, stand up, and take action you would rather avoid, in order to >prevent even >_greater_ problems later. > >Sometimes violence is the only solution. > >There is no "arrogance" in this, IMHO. > > > >> >>And what do you get from al this? More hate, more violence, more extremists, >>more people that want to strike back at you, more people that will dislike the >>American arrogance and so on. Well, good luck with your 'fight', then. As far as >>I am concerned, it is time we get a REAL president in the U.S., somebody like >>Roosevelt, who cares about *people* instead of money. > >Someone like Truman? Someone like Kennedy? Someone like Roosevelt? Someone >like Lincoln. _all_ of them had to make the _same_ decision at some point. All >made it. >IE thank goodness for Truman or most of Europe would be speaking German today. > >It isn't always the best answer. But it is sometimes the _only_ answer. Here Here !! Bush _has_ to act in what he feels is in the best interest of the USA First. To do otherwise would be dereliction. Ed > > > > >> >>Jeroen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.