Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:33:31 03/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2003 at 09:09:05, Albert Bertilsson wrote: >aybe I misunderstood your previous post, but what I intended to clarify was the >kind of situations that caused Sharper to search too deep. This happens without >the use of extensions of any kind. There just seems to be a few positions that >are searched very deep, and that's the reason for having the MAXPLY limitation. > >/Regards Albert Bertilsson It seems that I did not understand your post You wrote: "Both sides have a piece that they need to protect or defend, if they don't the loose almost immediatly. So the line is a series of moves from both sides trying to vary their game to push the inevitable draw forward." I understood from it that you extend in case that the side to move has a piece under threat. If you do not extend then I do not see why the fact that both side has a piece that they need to protect is relevant. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.