Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:16:20 03/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2003 at 00:56:46, Aaron Tay wrote: >On March 20, 2003 at 23:27:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 20, 2003 at 19:15:29, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On March 20, 2003 at 18:38:55, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >>> >>>>I believe I wrote to you about that some time ago. I currently have more than >>>>80Gb of 6-men TBs with pawns, including krppkr. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Eugene >>> >>>I am surprised to read it. >>> >>>You need first to have KRQP vs KRP,KRRP vs KRP,KRBP vs KRP,KRNP vs KRP. >>> >>>There are a lot of 6 piece endgame with only one pawn and I thought that having >>>all the 6 piece endgame tablebases with no pawns was done not long time ago so >>>I did not expect you to get endgames with 2 pawns. >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>All the pawnless ones are done (except for 5 vs 1). So he can make any >>particular table with pawns that he wants. > >I'm confused but the position in question has 2 pawns on the board. I.e KRKRPP, >doesnt it mean he needs KRKRXP where X is not a pawn? > >For example wouldnt KRKQRP be needed as well? That's a tablebase with 1 pawn, or >are the tablebases with only 1 pawn done as well? We already have _every_ table of the pawnless varieties. For two pawns, he needs the 1-pawn cases, correct. However, my response to Uri was about a _seven_ piece ending he had listed, if I understood his post correctly. You'd think that Eugene has the correct files or else he couldn't generate the tables. :)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.