Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:17:34 03/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2003 at 08:26:36, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 20, 2003 at 23:28:33, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On March 20, 2003 at 19:16:51, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On March 20, 2003 at 19:15:29, Uri Blass wrote: >>><snipped> >>>>You need first to have KRQP vs KRP,KRRP vs KRP,KRBP vs KRP,KRNP vs KRP. >>> >>>Correction KRQP vs KR and vs KR in the other places,... >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>Some of the above don't make sense. IE you have some 7 piece endings >>listed. KRNP vs KRP for example. > >This was the reason for my correction. > >KRQP vs KR and not v KRP and the same in other places. > >My point is that you need 4 tablebases with one pawn before you have one >tablebase with 2 pawns and finishing the 6 piece tablebase >without pawns was done only not a long time ago. > >Uri Right. However, Eugene has been burning the machines producing these things, and with 80+ gigs of new tables (all with pawns) I am pretty sure he has gotten way into the 1-pawn versions and been able to do some two-pawn cases for interesting positions.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.