Author: Peter Fendrich
Date: 09:04:02 03/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 22, 2003 at 11:43:16, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 22, 2003 at 11:28:31, George Wilson wrote: > >>Now that Computers routinely Destroy top Grandmasters, I think my interest in >>computer chess has Died. Finally Computers have Arrived at Super Grandmaster >>Strength, the Future looks bleak for humans, i no longer look up to Human >>Grandmasters, > >Maybe changing the rules may do computer chess more interesting for you. > >What is your opinion about a rule that let both sides to take back moves >3 times during a game when taking back move mean also taking back the times. > >I think that it may do 40/2 hours games between computers and humans more >interesting. > >It may be interesting to know how much elo humans may get against computers by >this rule. > >What is your opinion? > >Uri I think it's an intersting idea that eliminates human blunders in order to take advantage of the human positional and strategic knowledge. It will equalize the the game for at least another decade. /Pter
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.