Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 11:46:08 03/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 22, 2003 at 11:43:16, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 22, 2003 at 11:28:31, George Wilson wrote: > >>Now that Computers routinely Destroy top Grandmasters, I think my interest in >>computer chess has Died. Finally Computers have Arrived at Super Grandmaster >>Strength, the Future looks bleak for humans, i no longer look up to Human >>Grandmasters, > >Maybe changing the rules may do computer chess more interesting for you. > >What is your opinion about a rule that let both sides to take back moves >3 times during a game when taking back move mean also taking back the times. > >I think that it may do 40/2 hours games between computers and humans more >interesting. > >It may be interesting to know how much elo humans may get against computers by >this rule. > >What is your opinion? > >Uri IMO opening and endgame database usage should be allowed for all human players in matches against computers first. There were no fair conditions at all in past man vs. computer matches. Accepted only because the humans got money for playing against computers. The rule you suggest is probably also not fair. Computers often cant understand which move was a mistake. This is necessary to take back moves. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.