Author: Albert Bertilsson
Date: 13:26:30 03/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 21, 2003 at 09:33:31, Uri Blass wrote: >On March 21, 2003 at 09:09:05, Albert Bertilsson wrote: > >>aybe I misunderstood your previous post, but what I intended to clarify was the >>kind of situations that caused Sharper to search too deep. This happens without >>the use of extensions of any kind. There just seems to be a few positions that >>are searched very deep, and that's the reason for having the MAXPLY limitation. >> >>/Regards Albert Bertilsson > >It seems that I did not understand your post >You wrote: > >"Both sides have a piece that they need to protect or defend, if they don't the >loose almost immediatly. So the line is a series of moves from both sides trying >to vary their game to push the inevitable draw forward." > >I understood from it that you extend in case that the side to move has a piece >under threat. > >If you do not extend then I do not see why the fact that both side has >a piece that they need to protect is relevant. > I just described the type of position that caused the trouble I don't know why these positions search very deep, I just noticed that they do. I'm happy if it doesn't makes any sense to you because that probably means that it isn't something that I should feel bad about not understanding. /Regards Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.