Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 16:10:07 03/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 22, 2003 at 18:18:34, Alex wrote: > 1} I am REALLY disappointed in Nimzo 8. Why did they call it NIMZO? Nimzo played like nimzowitch. but this was only the versions <=4 or arround. the programmer later changed his program from a knowledge program into a fast-searcher program. the name remained. >2)I would like to see M-chess come back. not only you. we all want Mchess to come back. http://members.aol.com/mclanecxantia/myhomepage/mcp8_mani.html > 3) I >thought the W-chess engine was great at Positional chess (closed positions etc.) > found in the Power chess Porgrams and would LOVE to see this engine upgraded! in closed positions ? i thought it was better in open positions where it could sac ? >4) Rebel is a very interesting Program indeed. http://hometown.aol.de/mclanecxantia/knaak.html http://www.thorstenczub.de/rebelxp.html http://www.thorstenczub.de/rebel12.html 5) Really the chess base stable Fritz >, Shredder, Junior all play -relatively speaking tactically -they steer for Open >positions. I would LOVE to see an engine play in a HYPERMODERN style! I think >it would attract a fair market. Chessmaster can play some interesting chess >after tinkering with the personalities...... Does anyone have any opening books >that steer for closed positions? I spent about 100 hours on a Nimzovich book-- >(Larsens opening and Nimzo Kp def.) Perhaps a trade? Alex. some chess tiger versions played very good in closed positions.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.