Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Faulty logic

Author: Sally Weltrop

Date: 17:48:14 03/26/03

Go up one level in this thread


On March 26, 2003 at 13:18:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote:

>On March 26, 2003 at 10:22:08, Norman bates wrote:
>
>>Since you find it so hard to believe a top program can be beat two games
>>straight. What a weird Bunch you all are, you believe that edward nemeth can do
>>it, but doubt everyone else.
>
>Eduard posts his games along with time control and hardware used...
>
>Second there is no correlation between being weak at chess and not believing
>what you say! that is faulty logic.
>Infact it is often the trademark of a liar to accuse people who do not believe
>or agree with them of being bad, weak or whatever when faced with demands of
>proof. If you have indeed won 2 games staright then 1. you should have no
>problem posting the games along with match specs 2. If you did not save the
>game, you obviously have no problem winning over the program and can do it again
>and then remember to save the games and post them here...

Would it not be in autosave.cbh? :.)

>
>If you post your games then we can talk about believing or not, until then take
>a chill pill...
>
>Jonas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.