Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Sjeng... expected rating?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 22:17:04 03/27/03

Go up one level in this thread


On March 27, 2003 at 17:49:05, George Sobala wrote:

>On March 27, 2003 at 17:20:09, Peter Skinner wrote:
>
>>On March 27, 2003 at 17:18:49, Ed Panek wrote:
>>
>>>On March 27, 2003 at 17:08:57, Peter Skinner wrote:
>>>
>>>>What is the expected rating one could assume from Deep Sjeng on a PIV 2.0 Ghz
>>>>with 512 ram?
>>>>
>>>>Would it be higher rated than let's say Yace or Crafty?
>>>
>>>
>>>   I have been using Deep Sjeng for about 3 weeks now on a dual Athlon 2600+. It
>>>seems very strong in tactics. It sometimes seems to play endings poorly. This is
>>>just my opinion.
>>>
>>>  I would be willing to play you online for a large number of games to test it
>>>if you like
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Ed
>>
>>
>>What rating would you give it? Better than Crafty or Yace? Better than Nimzo or
>>Hiarcs?
>>
>>That is what I am looking for. I am thinking of purchasing it.
>>
>>Peter.
>
>Why? What do you want it for? I would guess that it is probably the weakest of
>the commercial engines, but it has its good points, especially its
>customisability.
>
>(finger redshift on ICC)

No

I guess that patzer is weaker than Deep Sjeng.
patzer is also weaker than yace and crafty.

I also think that strength in games is not the only point and people may want to
purchase a program that is best in some kind of positions and not in games.

I am going to consider doing movei commercial if it can promote to the best 22
winboard programs.

I think that at this point movei may be proven to be the best in some positions
even if it is not the best in playing chess.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.