Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:31:36 03/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On March 28, 2003 at 11:59:03, Earl Fuller wrote: >I was just looking at the latest ratings list. Shredder7 (2768)-Deep Fritz7 >(2760) and you know the list! I didn't see Deep Junior posted, perhaps the >testing isn't complete enough. The list of top playing programs has grown over >the years with Shredder,Fritz,Tiger,Junior leading the way, at this time. What >ever happened to Genius? (personally i always liked the Genius programs) >So who will be the winner? the first to break 2800, 3000? (USCF) >The SSDF rating list, British, Fide, all these differant ratings ( lolololol) >And by the way, the posted Shredder rating of (2768) is equal to what in USCF? >It can't be USCF, i mean 2768 in USCF, no way, lololol, I mean just think of >it, "ok, i'll say it", (lololol) if it's true, were getting close to (Fisher) >Or is it USCF? I can never get that right! I know, add this, subtract that, >divide that,_ yada, yada, yada,___just post it in plain english (USCF) >Earl add 200 elo to the list and you will get uscf rating(at least for the programs with low rating). You cannot compare it to USCF because the pool are different but I see no reason to assume that programs of today cannot be better than fisher. There are no fair matches against humans when the humans can buy the program and learn it's weaknesses (they cannot do it against humans). If programs get in these unfair conditions super GM performance then it seems clear that they are at least at super GM level Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.