Author: Harald Faber
Date: 00:17:11 10/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 1998 at 19:01:38, Keith Ian Price wrote: >>>>>Nunn-Match 40/120, 20/60 >>>>> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>>>>1 HIARCS 6,P233MMX 2540 1½1111½1111½0½½11½11 16.0/20 >>>>>2 CST Black,PII-400 2450 0½0000½0000½1½½00½00 4.0/20 >>>>> >>>>>ELO performance difference Hiarcs P233MMX - CST PII400: 240 >> >>>>Performance on ICC was: >>>> >>>>Opponents avg. rating: 2393 >>>>CSTWin/BETA +19 =9 -38 total: 36% >>>>ELO-Performance 2284 >> >>>I cannot believe that Cstalwin95 has only 2300 in serious games after seeing the >>>results of Thorsten's tournament(Cstal has 6.5 out of 9) >>>Uri >> >>Thorstens tourney results is like flipping a coin. EVERYTHING is possible. > >I think that the ICC games were blitz or rapid chess games, and CSTal does much >better in games at tournament time controls than at blitz. Thorsten's tournament >is at 40/120, and therefore his results are quite possible, although any single >tournament should not be used as a measure of the strength of a program. >kp Start reading above. The Nunn-Test, onem ay call it none-test, was played in tournament mode. SO no excuses.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.