Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Take a look at 1. h3 b6?! pointing at the light squares

Author: Marc van Hal

Date: 09:42:50 03/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On March 30, 2003 at 08:52:27, Jorge Pichard wrote:

>On March 30, 2003 at 08:48:43, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On March 29, 2003 at 08:56:40, Marc van Hal wrote:
>>
>>>On March 29, 2003 at 06:31:36, Chris Carson wrote:
>>>
>>>>On March 29, 2003 at 05:40:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Hi Jorge
>>>>>
>>>>>I do not understand what's your intention of this "test". Of course can White
>>>>>open with 1.h3 and it will of course happen from time to time that White can win
>>>>>a game. But what does this tell us?
>>>>>
>>>>>Kurt
>>>>
>>>>One thing it means to me is that the Opening Book and perhaps some evaluation
>>>>tuning could improve Fritz.  There are move of these and finding them (elusive)
>>>>is interesting and helpful to the Fritz team.  Just my thoughts.  :)
>>>
>>>This are indeed some sort of anti computer move
>>>But I would say 1.h3!? instead of 1.h3!
>>>1.h3 infact points to d4 if it understands that we are already a step further.
>>>When i posted analyzes of 1.h3 I mentioned that it might be so that in the
>>>future very strong chessprograms come to the conclusion that this might be one
>>>of the best moves
>>> Acording to me 1.h3,b6 or 1..,b5 might be good choise at least pointing at the
>>>light not the dark squares .
>>>
>>>Marc
>>
>>
>>1.h3 b6 2.e4 e6 3.Nf3 d5 4.exd5 exd5 5.d4 Bd6 6.Bd3 Qe7+ 7.Be3 Bf4 8.Qe2 Bxe3
>>0.28/12  24  9.Qxe3   0.25/11  4  Qxe3+   0.31/12  39  10.fxe3   0.28/11  4  Nf6
>>  0.31/11  13  11.Nc3   0.25/11  15  Nbd7   0.25/11  22  12.0-0-0 Bb7   0.22/14
>>57  13.Rhe1 Ne4   0.56/14  37  14.Bxe4 dxe4   0.41/13  5  15.Nd2 Nf6   0.25/14
>>15  16.Rf1 0-0-0   0.22/12  10  17.Rf4 h6   0.41/14  1:06  18.Rdf1 Rhe8
>>0.41/12  29  19.Rxf6 gxf6   -0.06/12  2  20.Rxf6 Rg8   -0.06/14  52  21.g4 h5
>>-0.41/14  36  22.Rf4 hxg4   -0.28/13  14  23.hxg4 f5   -0.19/15  54  24.gxf5
>>Rg1+   -0.34/12  3  25.Rf1 Rxf1+   -0.16/14  5  26.Nxf1 Rg8   -0.16/17  1:35
>>27.Kd1 Rg1   -0.06/14  13  28.Ke1 Ba6   -0.38/16  41  29.Ne2 Bxe2   -0.31/15  13
>> 30.Kxe2 Line
>>
>>This is the position after 30, Kxe2, as you can see 1.h3,b6 is Not a winning
>>Line for Black. I just played this game in Blitz 10 Min
>>
>>
>>[D]2k5/p1p5/1p6/5P2/3Pp3/4P3/PPP1K3/5Nr1 b - - 0 30
>>
>>
>>Analysis by Fritz 8:
>>
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Rg1 32.Ke2
>>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 7/20   00:00:00  22kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Rg1 32.Ke2
>>  =  (0.00)   Depth: 8/18   00:00:00  46kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd7 32.Nd2 Rg1+ 33.Ke2 Rg4 34.c4 Ke7 35.Kd1 Kf6
>>  =  (-0.06)   Depth: 9/21   00:00:00  94kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Kf6 35.Nd4 Rg2 36.Ne6 Kxf5
>>37.Nxc7
>>  ³  (-0.31)   Depth: 10/22   00:00:00  195kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Kf6 35.Nd4 Rg2 36.Ne6 Kxf5
>>37.Nxc7
>>  ³  (-0.31)   Depth: 11/20   00:00:00  313kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Kf6 35.Nd4 Rg2 36.Kc1 Ke5 37.c4
>>a6
>>  ³  (-0.44)   Depth: 12/26   00:00:01  616kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Kf6 35.Nd4 Rg2 36.a3 a6 37.Ne6
>>  ³  (-0.38)   Depth: 13/26   00:00:02  1356kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Kf6 35.Nd4 Rg2 36.a3 a6 37.Ne6
>>  ³  (-0.38)   Depth: 14/27   00:00:05  2883kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Rg2 35.Nd4 Kd6 36.Ne6 Rf2 37.c4
>>  ³  (-0.44)   Depth: 15/30   00:00:11  6305kN
>>30...Rg2+!
>>  µ  (-0.72)   Depth: 16/53   00:00:25  13840kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Rg2 35.Nd4 Kd6 36.Ke1 Kxd5
>>37.f6 Ke5 38.f7
>>  µ  (-0.72)   Depth: 17/35   00:00:54  28824kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Rg2 35.Nd4 Kd6 36.f6 Rf2 37.c4
>>Rxf6
>>  ³  (-0.69)   Depth: 18/34   00:02:13  67293kN
>>30...Rg2+ 31.Kd1 Kd8 32.Nd2 Rg4 33.d5 Ke7 34.Nb3 Rg2 35.Kc1 Re2 36.Nd4 Rxe3
>>37.Kd2 Rh3 38.Nb5 Rf3
>>  µ  (-0.72)   Depth: 19/54   00:04:55  146347kN

Jorge 1 question do you actualy know why Fritz evaluated the position for a
longtime as good for White?
Maybe you will get a beter vieuw on the postion when you can answer it.
But showing  comp comp games to make theoretical statments is a bit dumb
Especialy 10 minute games

Still If you don't know the answer I will give it.
1 hint is Kings Indian .

Marc



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.