Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pocket PC: NPS and rating

Author: Eugene Nalimov

Date: 19:03:52 03/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


Pocket PC lacks L2 cache.

Thanks,
Eugene

On March 30, 2003 at 13:59:53, Tom Kerrigan wrote:

>On March 30, 2003 at 11:53:21, James Constance wrote:
>
>>1.  Why is there such a difference in Nodes Per Second in Pocket PCs when
>>compared with PCs?  e.g. Shredder on my Athlon 1200 Mhz might do 180,000 NPS for
>>a given position, whereas my StrongArm 200 Mhz does only 4,500 NPS for the same
>>position.  That's a factor of 40 - I was optimistically expecting it to be
>>closer to the ratio in processor speeds.
>>
>>2.  Anybody have a stab at how much this reduces the SSDF quoted rating by?
>>
>>cheers!
>
>These processors should be reasonably fast. I wonder if the problem isn't FSB
>frequency or width. It's entirely possible that PPCs have, say, an 8 bit data
>bus to save on pins/traces/size/power consumption/etc.
>
>-Tom



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.