Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Here is your _new_ data results...

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 10:51:44 04/01/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 01, 2003 at 12:59:23, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On April 01, 2003 at 09:36:31, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>I'm pretty sure, however, that you will not see another response from Vincent.
>>He
>>makes a stupid statement, results disprove his statement completely, so he runs
>>and
>>hides (again).
>
>what the hell are you bragging now?
>
>as usual you forgot to post the logfiles. only when you feel a kalashnikov in
>your head you post logfiles. but from cray blitz we will of course never see a
>logfile anymore :)


If you want, I can certainly post them.  It is only 360K bytes.  The data I
posted certainly addresses the question "what is the best hash size to use
for Crafty doing 1-2 minute searches on a machine searching about 1M
nodes per second?"

Of course, no matter what gets posted, you will always claim there is
a "flaw" in what was done.  you didn't like my positions.  I ran yours.
Now you don't like the data I provided.  That's typical...

As far as Cray Blitz goes, you are probably correct unless I one day choose
to go back and re-type about 60,000 lines of Fortran and 20,000 lines of
assembly and debug it all again.  No source files exist, no log files
exist.  All I have is printed stuff from those days now.

Which is neither here nor there in terms of importance since it hasn't played
chess in almost 10 years now anyway.



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.