Author: alan palmer
Date: 07:00:10 04/02/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 02, 2003 at 06:38:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 01, 2003 at 19:59:26, alan palmer wrote: > >>Its one thing to discuss the issues involved but sending these type of emails to >>individuals makes it personal and thats out of order. > > > >Objection! Ok, I don't know you and have no idea of your involvement into CC but >the key for a better understanding of these PERSONAL emails, are ____ now your >turn ... have you no idea? The key for these personal cynical postcards is the >PERSONAL connection estimated by the sender with the addressees. Ok, but the two >mentioned addrressees already refused to show any kind of personal concern. BOTH >have reacted as if they were sitting on Dubya's lap or Laura's? :) > > >Folks IF WE here in the community lose the rest of our humour, call it cynism, >that is so important for any kind of intellectual living, then we've lost the >battle of our lives. We ain't no such fools, no? > >It's astonishing that you saw the main key but you waved your arms as if you had >discovered the abyss of Evil. But the key is designed to be our only hope! >I can only advise to go into personal talks between all of you, Europeans and >Americans alike. > >Rolf Tueschen Are you for real? Of course its personal: why send them to the individuals concerned otherwise. Emails to individuals are by their very nature, PERSONAL. As for whether Bruce took the emails personally I suggest you read his comments again. If it was a general comment about the war why not just post on the relevant site and leave it at that. As for my involvement with this site (why should that be mentioned), i was not aware i needed to post my C.V. before I made a comment - I will comment where i think fit. Your comments re addresses etc is pontificating crap.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.