Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 07:30:37 04/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2003 at 08:28:20, Torstein Hall wrote: >On April 03, 2003 at 05:40:03, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On April 03, 2003 at 02:09:22, Bruce Moreland wrote: >> >>>On April 02, 2003 at 23:56:13, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>I think that he will be happy if you do not go. >>>> >>>>His interest is probably to win the tournament and he will do everything fair or >>>>unfair to do it because if I understood correctly >>>>the winner is probably going to get a match against the world champion with >>>>prizes similiar to Junior-Kasparov. >>> >>>The thought did not cross my mind, and I reject this explanation. Regardless of >>>the interpretation of the email, I believe that the sender is sincere. >> >> >>Why not giving the truth its honour. Why not adding that he's sincere in his >>opposition against this war, Bruce, and NOT you personally! >> >>Rolf > >He (and you?) can obviously not see the difference between a nation and >individuals living there. Against the war, or not, if you can not make this >distinction he must be pretty stupid (or pretty evil) and at the same time >against Bruce personally! I don't know if you wrote the message before or after my message about ART, but let us assume before. Well, we have here a problem that you might be a clever man but you are not experienced enough to realise what the emails (personal emails) really are made for with these pictures and sub-lines.Please read the other messages where I tried to explain it. Let me add - if you write here or I we have one dimension. We have a clear topic. But the topic of such postcards with commented or underlined pictures is more complex. It's art. So by defiition you can't read: every living American is only a good one if he's dead or like Bruce exaggerated in his national hystery, if he's tortured and bestially killed. Is all this too complicated for you, then it's nonsense to further discuss it. Perhaps you are experienced enough that exactly art always in history was a pain in the back. Because the powerful couldn't say exactly where the provokation was lying. Here Donninger just put two diverging items together! And the picture exists in the eyes of the observer. Also the interpretation. Sent to you in a private email I would rethink twice and thrice etc. before I would go into public, complain and resigned from the list of participants of the next Wch. I mean most of you know here that not to everybody USA is darling number one. But - history told us that no power number one was darling of anybody... > >Torstein > >> >> >> >>> >>>bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.