Author: Torstein Hall
Date: 12:54:21 04/03/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2003 at 10:30:37, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 03, 2003 at 08:28:20, Torstein Hall wrote: > >>On April 03, 2003 at 05:40:03, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 03, 2003 at 02:09:22, Bruce Moreland wrote: >>> >>>>On April 02, 2003 at 23:56:13, Uri Blass wrote: >>>> >>>>>I think that he will be happy if you do not go. >>>>> >>>>>His interest is probably to win the tournament and he will do everything fair or >>>>>unfair to do it because if I understood correctly >>>>>the winner is probably going to get a match against the world champion with >>>>>prizes similiar to Junior-Kasparov. >>>> >>>>The thought did not cross my mind, and I reject this explanation. Regardless of >>>>the interpretation of the email, I believe that the sender is sincere. >>> >>> >>>Why not giving the truth its honour. Why not adding that he's sincere in his >>>opposition against this war, Bruce, and NOT you personally! >>> >>>Rolf >> >>He (and you?) can obviously not see the difference between a nation and >>individuals living there. Against the war, or not, if you can not make this >>distinction he must be pretty stupid (or pretty evil) and at the same time >>against Bruce personally! > >I don't know if you wrote the message before or after my message about ART, but >let us assume before. Well, we have here a problem that you might be a clever >man but you are not experienced enough to realise what the emails (personal >emails) really are made for with these pictures and sub-lines.Please read the >other messages where I tried to explain it. > >Let me add - if you write here or I we have one dimension. We have a clear >topic. But the topic of such postcards with commented or underlined pictures is >more complex. It's art. So by defiition you can't read: every living American is >only a good one if he's dead or like Bruce exaggerated in his national hystery, >if he's tortured and bestially killed. Is all this too complicated for you, then >it's nonsense to further discuss it. Perhaps you are experienced enough that >exactly art always in history was a pain in the back. Because the powerful >couldn't say exactly where the provokation was lying. Here Donninger just put >two diverging items together! And the picture exists in the eyes of the >observer. Also the interpretation. Sent to you in a private email I would >rethink twice and thrice etc. before I would go into public, complain and >resigned from the list of participants of the next Wch. > >I mean most of you know here that not to everybody USA is darling number one. >But - history told us that no power number one was darling of anybody... I belive it was Einstein that said something close to this: "If you can not explain it to a kid, you do not understand it properly yourself." But I guess he was only unexperienced or stupid or whatever. Torstein PS. I did not read your message about art, but from this message I think you got it mixed up with its evil relative, propaganda! > > > > > >> >>Torstein >> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>>bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.