Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 03:31:07 04/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 03, 2003 at 21:36:54, Peter Skinner wrote: >>Peter, I answer you because I always liked the name Peter. And Skinner is a >>famous behaviorist. >> >>Please do me a favour and spell with me, letter after letter: >> >> >>P -O-L-I-T-I-C-A-L ART. > >Again.. it is not art. Not even political. By no means are the pictures art. > > >> And NB not the pictures alone are ART, they are NOT, but the context of these >>pictures and the wordings on the postcards, this is a form of art. That together >>is called political art or propaganda art. Just call it the way you want. But >>don't go so low and insinuate that I could have called naked pictures "art". In >>Germany there's a famous artist, Staeck, who does such postcards. In Canada >>there must be the one or the other too. Just make a little research. Hey, let me >>out of your terrible special forces. Peace. :)= >> >> >>Rolf > >If Canada has such terrible Special Forces, why did we beat the World in the >latest "War Games"? And yes, that includes the U.S. > >"Postcards" of dead soldiers is not art. You obviously misunderstood me, so I >will repeat it again: > >THOSE PICTURES CAN NEVER EVEN RESEMBLE ART!. > >Your an idiot. Can you honestly walk around and chew gum at the same time >without falling over? I would be surprised. And you can't be a natural Canadian because your English sucks. I never said that the pictures alone were art. I can't help you if you are too bad in either reading or thinking. I said that pictures in combination with the sub-lines added, that this is potentially[because I never saw the originals, but I saw the pictures seperately from the text of the added lines] in this case here political art, propaganda. Period.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.