Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 04:12:51 04/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 2003 at 06:25:27, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 04, 2003 at 05:55:17, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On April 04, 2003 at 05:30:15, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 04, 2003 at 02:31:08, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On April 03, 2003 at 20:39:52, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>This time you argue way better. >>>> >>>>>But please tell me why Bruce is a victim. >>>> >>>>Because you reason as if mankind is a robot without feelings. >>>> >>>>Nuff said. >> >> >>>You perhaps, but Ed, I tell you something. You are really confused because what >>>you normally publish in CTF you should _defend_ Chrilly, your former collegue, >>>and you should punch Bruce for the scandal of publishing private emails. Period. >> >>I should this, I should that... I am not your puppy Rolf :) >> >> >> >>>You are saying Good-Bye to all the Anti-Americanism you posted into CTF? Or are >>>you split into CCC Ed and CTF Ed? >> >>I oppose the US government and their actions, I have no argument with its >>citizens. >> >>But maybe you will understand better if someome starts to send you Holocaust >>pictures by email and personally blame you for their death because you are >>german. >> >>Man is no robot, the thing has feelings and certain lines can not be crossed, >>you as a professional psychologist certainly will recognize some logic in that. > > >And therefore I know, only therefore, that Bruce destroyed the whole context by >going into public. > >Ed, it is simply not sound. Helpers come running telling us that Chrilly was >atleast sending Briuce "veiled death threat". Even Bruce said no to such >nonsense. I knew it already before that it wasn't blackmail or such, it's not a >personal threat. It's more the try to make someone think. Because what Bruce >wrote in CTF was enough to show how he thought. And he was very confused. Much >much less than you for example. :) > >Know what I mean? > >Going into public withprivate emails? > > >As you know I do never avoid a question. I mean suppression. I read your >question with the unavoidable Holocaust analogy. This is scandalous with >how little care you use this tool. But let me analyse. > > >If I received Now out of the blue such propaganda in private email I would >ignore it. You will understand below why. > >If however I were someone who was deeply involved into that unthinkable evil I >would be concerned. I knew that someone had foundout my involvement. > >If however I had posted into usenet or CTF continual denials of the Holocaust, >me as a German [of course I would never do this], and if I then received such >material, it would also concern me. But I tellyou something, Ed, I had more >class than Bruce. I wouldn't be so stupic and running into CCC [or comparable >institutions] just to whine about the privately received emails. > >It's a typical zwick. Either you judge it is spam or not. If not I would >correspond with the sender. Because he had a reason for his message. Perhaps a >general concern, more probable, my messages in [a comparable] CTF. The concern >here with Chrilly is openly clear. It's the same what you write into CTF all day >long. But to cut all communication, taking offense and calling wolf in CCC is >surely not the best Bruce could have done. With his publishing of main parts of >private email Bruce crossed the border to indecent behaviour. > >He could have had only a single reason to go into public. And exactly this >reason was just now disclaimed by Bruce. If it would have been blackmailed death >threat. Only then. But it wasn't. It was political art and propaganda. > >Sometimes a basic education in logical reasoning is better than studies in >psychology, Ed. :) > > >Best, >Rolf Your defence lacks the argument the sender is part of the organization of the WC. Bruce clearly said that in case the sender wasn't part of the organization he would not feel offended and go to Graz. My best, Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.