Author: alan palmer
Date: 05:54:39 04/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 2003 at 05:21:40, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 03, 2003 at 21:22:46, alan palmer wrote: > >>On April 03, 2003 at 06:07:04, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 02, 2003 at 10:00:10, alan palmer wrote: >>> >>>>On April 02, 2003 at 06:38:08, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 01, 2003 at 19:59:26, alan palmer wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Its one thing to discuss the issues involved but sending these type of emails to >>>>>>individuals makes it personal and thats out of order. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Objection! Ok, I don't know you and have no idea of your involvement into CC but >>>>>the key for a better understanding of these PERSONAL emails, are ____ now your >>>>>turn ... have you no idea? The key for these personal cynical postcards is the >>>>>PERSONAL connection estimated by the sender with the addressees. Ok, but the two >>>>>mentioned addrressees already refused to show any kind of personal concern. BOTH >>>>>have reacted as if they were sitting on Dubya's lap or Laura's? :) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Folks IF WE here in the community lose the rest of our humour, call it cynism, >>>>>that is so important for any kind of intellectual living, then we've lost the >>>>>battle of our lives. We ain't no such fools, no? >>>>> >>>>>It's astonishing that you saw the main key but you waved your arms as if you had >>>>>discovered the abyss of Evil. But the key is designed to be our only hope! >>>>>I can only advise to go into personal talks between all of you, Europeans and >>>>>Americans alike. >>>>> >>>>>Rolf Tueschen >>>> >>>>Are you for real? Of course its personal: why send them to the individuals >>>>concerned otherwise. Emails to individuals are by their very nature, PERSONAL. >>> >>>As I said, you see it but still you support open publication. Who is real here? >>> >>> >>>>As for whether Bruce took the emails personally I suggest you read his comments >>>>again. If it was a general comment >>> >>>I knew that it could make no sense talking to you. You simply can't understand. >>>It WAS personal because the two know each other. Enough said? >>> >>> >>>>about the war why not just post on the >>>>relevant site and leave it at that. As for my involvement with this site (why >>>>should that be mentioned), i was not aware i needed to post my C.V. before I >>>>made a comment - I will comment where i think fit. >>>> >>>>Your comments re addresses etc is pontificating crap. >> >>I am quite aware they know each other but according to you Bruce did not take >>the email personally - my point was I think he did. If you read his mail >>carefully you might have noticed it. Are you saying you wouldn't have!! You must >>be very thicked skinned. > > >The other day I had someone who didn't know the term turkey. Now I have you >confusing the term personally. > >1) Like you I always saw that Bruce had taken this private email *personally*. > >BUT > >2) My objection is NOT aginst his personal reaction but the following: that >Bruce didn't keep personal a personal and private email but went into public >here and published it more or less. That is the scandal. > > >Please try to read and think a bit more carefully. Thanks. > > > > >> >>As for open publication, I did not say I was against that: I'm against making >>these issues personal. It solves nothing and can make the situation worse but >>you waffle on so much you lose the thread of your own argument! So, from now on, >>why don't you: 1) put away your professorial hat and 2) stop thinking you are >>always right. You know it makes sense. >> >>Oh and don't take this this message personally! I suggest you read your comments again and be more clear in the future. As for Bruce going public with this matter, I agree with him: By ignoring what they say It would make life easy for those that who send these type of emails but by going public it shows them up for what they are, nasty. We clearly cannot agree on this matter, so we should agree to disagree. Bye.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.