Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 14:51:41 04/04/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 04, 2003 at 16:58:31, Amir Ban wrote: >On April 04, 2003 at 13:36:23, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >> >>Correct. Also, I did not reproduce the emails in whole, instead I quoted from >>them. I had some interest in preserving the author's copyright. If hairs are >>split, it may be found that I was a little loose with this, but on the other >>hand, the email to me also contained copyrighted material (the "art"). >> > >You are crazy if you are going to be defensive about this. I don't know where >the posters of this newsgroup got the queer notion that publishing an email or >letter you received is not legal, or a breach of copyright. It's not. A letter >you received is your property to do whatever you want with it. > >If we are going to get legal, then you should have answered the first email you >received "Please don't send me any more such emails". The legal term for further >emails would then be harassment. If you seriously don't want to receive such >messages you can get a restraining order, though I believe you'll need to get it >in Austria. > >Amir Amir let's be a bit objective here. He did ship content back at which Chrilly could conclude if he was just IQ=100 that Bruce didn't appreciate what he got. Further Chrilly got back some furious reaction from me asking him why he was in favour of the Saddam regime. Chrilly didn't deny this question. So using your own logics as above here, that would legally mean that Chrilly is supporting the Saddam regime. Do you agree or disagree now? Vincent
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.