Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 11:06:05 04/05/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 05, 2003 at 13:52:54, Angrim wrote: >Hmm, do you mean 9% faster NPS? if so your move ordering has likely been >hurt by the new hash method, since no way the hashing was taking 9% of >the time before. It was 9% faster in calculating perft, so no move ordering. The only thing I can think of is that the CPU liked working with two 32-bit keys seperately instead of one 64-bit key. Maybe the compiler was able to perform an extra optimization. Who knows.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.