Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why I am not going to the Graz WCCC

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 03:37:06 04/06/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 06, 2003 at 05:42:18, Andreas Schwartmann wrote:

>On April 05, 2003 at 21:18:28, David Dory wrote:
>
>>On April 05, 2003 at 13:00:36, Andreas Schwartmann wrote:
>>
>>>On April 01, 2003 at 18:37:01, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Personally, I am neutral as to all political affairs.
>>>
>>>How can you be neutral when it comes to murder? When it comes to imperialstic
>>>delusions of grandeur?
>>>
>>>The Bush junta are war criminals and they do not deserve my neutrality.
>>> <snip>
>>>Andreas
>>
>>I laugh at the high hypocrisy so intrinsically evident in a moral/political
>>lecture from a German national.
>
>So I am wrong just because I am German?
>
>>If it wasn't for millions of dollars of allied aid (directly), and lots more in
>>humanitarian aid, thousands more Germans would have starved or died from disease
>>after WWII, and your country would have been in ruins for generations.
>
>
>This does not make an illegal breach of international law right. This does not
>justify murder. Does it?
>
>
>>Because we aren't imperialists
>
>Next thing you tell me is you still believe in Santa Claus.
>
>Maybe the majority of US citizens are not imperialistic. Hell, they don't even
>know the essentials of geography and wouldn't know about the existance of Iraq,
>Iran and North Corea at all if not for CNN.
>
>But the current administration definetely IS imperialistic.
>
>
>>Read up on the UN's weapon inspectors reports and news releases. Saddam's deceit
>>and lies regarding his weapons are well documented - by experts from around the
>>world.
>
>
>So what? You want to declare a war on anybody who ever lied and cheated? Go
>ahead, take your time!
>
>>What the US and the UN have asked of Iraq is easy to do.
>
>
>Why should Saddam comply to international law when the US don't give shit either
>and break international treaties whenever it suits them?
>
>
>>South Africa disarmed through the UN - showing great cooperation and a template
>>for Iraq to follow. But Saddam's not interested.
>
>I tell you what: Even if Saddam fully complied with all the UN resolutions ever
>made: Bush still would have gone to war. He is a religous fundamentalist and
>it's his crusade. And it's a family business. And there's oil. It's not about UN
>resolutions. Bush only cares about the UN if it's for his favors.
>
>>have WMD to help conquer or threaten other countries. And he is a war monger,
>>first, last, and foremost.
>
>As is Bush.
>
>Andreas

Hi,

didn't know you from this side yet. Strong!

Best,
Rolf



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.