Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:00:25 04/06/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 06, 2003 at 09:55:19, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 06, 2003 at 09:48:56, Ian Kennedy wrote: > >>There is no qsearch. What exactly do you mean by 'what evaluation function do >>you use'? > >then this renders your experiments to useless, because experiments with a >gametree that suffer from horizon effects which get backupped to the root are >completely useless for obvious reasons. > >Why not measure something in the game of 4 connect? No need for a qsearch there. >No need for nullmove. That game was solved in 1988. If you want to play it in demensions that were not solved then I do not understand why no need for qsearch and null moves. I think that qsearch can help in that game and when the side that moved threats to win in the next move then you can extend preventing him to win in the qsearch until no side threats to win or can win in the next move. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.