Author: blass uri
Date: 10:08:57 10/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On October 10, 1998 at 00:42:51, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On October 09, 1998 at 22:44:27, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>nope... KB vs KB == 0.00 in crafty, period... >>ditto for KN vs KN, KNN vs K, KNN vs KN, etc.. > >It's interesting. > >8/8/8/r7/1nB5/8/N7/K1k5 b - - 0 1 > >Or, for the FEN-impaired: > >wKa1, wNa2, wBc4 >bKc1, bNb4, bRa5 > >Black to move mates in two. > >This is an illustrative (hence un-aesthetic) chess problem that I just composed. > >I bet some programs can't handle this in some way. They'll either not find the >mate, or they'll find the mate, but declare a draw after 1. ... Rxa2+ 2. Bxa2. Junior5 does not find the mate but it is not a practical problem in this position because Kc2 is also winning Uri > >bruce
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.