Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 07:24:35 04/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 06, 2003 at 18:29:23, Chessfun wrote: >On April 06, 2003 at 18:09:01, Marc van Hal wrote: > >>On April 06, 2003 at 15:35:22, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On April 06, 2003 at 13:45:25, Marc van Hal wrote: >>> >>>>On April 05, 2003 at 13:19:23, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 04, 2003 at 16:28:31, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On April 04, 2003 at 10:23:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On April 04, 2003 at 10:02:14, Marc van Hal wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Why don't you for once give a real result >>>>>>>>Rather then made up once. >>>>>>>>Marc >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Why do you accuse sarah for not giving real result >>>>>>>when you have no evidence for it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Uri >>>>>> >>>>>>What do you think your self you do have all programs don't you? >>>>>>Do I need evidence I contrair >>>>>>Sara needs strong evidence. >>>>> >>>>>Needs strong evidence? what for?. >>>>>To quote you; >>>>> >>>>>"It is also childish to try to make me unpolite >>>>>While your the on who is unpolite here." >>>>> >>>>>Sara.....h >>>> >>>>My quote is wrongly chosen g..here . >>>>What is the point of creating tournaments when you know in front who will win? >>>>I actualy can do that with the games of the SSDF >>>>Delete some wins from Shredder and Fritz and we are there. >>>>Marc >>> >>>Mark you need "strong evidence". >>>Where do you get off making statements like that, with nothing to support it? >>>So, it would seem the quote was posted in the right context !! >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Do you always count with two measures? >> >>Marc > >You speak in riddles, why not simply say what's on your mind? ! > >Sarah. I don't speak in riddles I asked you a question Asking a question over a question is kind of dumb. Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.