Author: Charles Worthington
Date: 15:00:35 04/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2003 at 17:52:26, Charles Worthington wrote: >On April 07, 2003 at 17:49:31, Aaron Gordon wrote: > >>On April 07, 2003 at 17:31:45, Charles Worthington wrote: >> >>>In the below game white played the move 77.Rc2?? with an eval of +1.16. On the >>>following move black, of course, immediately gave check with 77...Bf5+! and >>>stole the rook with an eval of -6.69. It is rather obvious that even a 1600 >>>human player would not have made such a laughable blunder only 1 ply ahead. My >>>question is was this blunder the result of the ridiculously overclocked cpu? >>>Shredder 7 is not known for such blunders and in a repeat of the position on my >>>machine my Xeons did not even consider that move let alone play it. If this >>>isn't proof enough that overclocked cpu's are unstable then I don't know what >>>is... >> >>Try posting the game in a format someone can use. >> >>Also, this just looks to be a continuation of your AMD-bashing. Nothing more. > > >AMD Bashing? LOL...Hardy...Perhaps overclocking bashing might be more accurate. >:-) I'll try to convert the format. Once you see the position and the move Aaron I think you will agree that it is a legitimate question as to the stability of _this_ particular overclocked cpu...not all of them. My question is how do you know which will act this way and which will not?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.