Author: Charles Worthington
Date: 21:53:40 04/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2003 at 00:36:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 07, 2003 at 18:44:30, Charles Worthington wrote: > >>On April 07, 2003 at 18:36:11, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>Everyone already knows the Athlon is a numerical powerhouse and the Xeon was >>>designed to demux HDTV streams for my grandmother, so there is really no need to >>>'show you the speed'. If you just can't understand the obvious, you should >>>build yourself a *real* computer. Technology moves fast, and you are already >>>being left behind. >>> >>>anthony >> >>Perhaps, but that is still talk...I just want someone to come to the server and >>enlighten us all as to the error of our ways but it seems that no one is willing >>to come show us a real machine. Why could that be do you think? Could it be >>because you know you cannot post a faster speed? I can show you deep fritz 7 >>screenshots as high as 5777kN/s in endgames with 2500-2900kN/s averages in >>midgames. Lets both run a deepfritzmark and post the result here to compare. >>That is a relatively simple way to show me what a real machine can do. I think >>that is a reasonable request. I just want to see which machine I should be >>playing chess with... > >At world champs 2002 chessbase showed up with AMD hardware. Guess why. > >Other champs they take what the sponsor gives them. > >I want to bet that the prescott is not released end of 2003. means that they >will show up with dual AMD, because you can't clock the Xeon higher in 0.13 than >it is now (3.06Ghz is limit simply as it consumes 105 watt there). Period. > >So the K7 which still can get clocked higher still than it is now till it also >consumes around 100 watts, will get faster and faster till that time. It's >already faster now. > >It's a matter of what the sponsor gives simply!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.