Author: Charles Worthington
Date: 22:03:21 04/07/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2003 at 00:59:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 08, 2003 at 00:55:43, Charles Worthington wrote: > >>On April 08, 2003 at 00:36:12, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2003 at 18:44:30, Charles Worthington wrote: >>> >>>>On April 07, 2003 at 18:36:11, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >>>> >>>>>Everyone already knows the Athlon is a numerical powerhouse and the Xeon was >>>>>designed to demux HDTV streams for my grandmother, so there is really no need to >>>>>'show you the speed'. If you just can't understand the obvious, you should >>>>>build yourself a *real* computer. Technology moves fast, and you are already >>>>>being left behind. >>>>> >>>>>anthony >>>> >>>>Perhaps, but that is still talk...I just want someone to come to the server and >>>>enlighten us all as to the error of our ways but it seems that no one is willing >>>>to come show us a real machine. Why could that be do you think? Could it be >>>>because you know you cannot post a faster speed? I can show you deep fritz 7 >>>>screenshots as high as 5777kN/s in endgames with 2500-2900kN/s averages in >>>>midgames. Lets both run a deepfritzmark and post the result here to compare. >>>>That is a relatively simple way to show me what a real machine can do. I think >>>>that is a reasonable request. I just want to see which machine I should be >>>>playing chess with... >>> >>>At world champs 2002 chessbase showed up with AMD hardware. Guess why. >>> >>>Other champs they take what the sponsor gives them. >>> >>>I want to bet that the prescott is not released end of 2003. means that they >>>will show up with dual AMD, because you can't clock the Xeon higher in 0.13 than >>>it is now (3.06Ghz is limit simply as it consumes 105 watt there). Period. >>> >>>So the K7 which still can get clocked higher still than it is now till it also >>>consumes around 100 watts, will get faster and faster till that time. It's >>>already faster now. >>> >>>It's a matter of what the sponsor gives simply! >> >>Actually Matthias Feist Used his own Dual 2.8 Xeon for fritz at the latest >>padderborn tournament. Call him on the phone and ask him why he did so....I did. >>He did not use a machine supplied by a sponsor. he used his own personal >>machine....and won the tournament. >> >>Charles > >Actually i played df7 there for like 6 hours. regrettably it came away with a >draw against DIEP (yet again). diep managed to conquer a pawn after quite a >while but to no avail. > >i asked him why he didn't run on a dual K7. > >answer: "sponsor gave this machine" > >i aske dhim whether he had tested whether 2 threads with SMT turned off were >giving bigger search depth than 4 threads with SMT turned on. He told me he >hadn't tested it at all. That's why he used 4 threads. > >That's why stefan who had tested it, played with SMT turned off and played dual >Xeon 2.8. > >if you have a sponsor like they have, you always go for the machine the sponsor >provide. the alternative is buying a dual K7, and that's quite a bit more >expensive than using that provided machine... > >I got home. quoted for first position out of book fritz had against me what >speed it there had and some people who sometimes post here too, had a much >faster fritz at their dual K7. > >Best regards, >Vincent A friend and i just took dual screenshots on the chessbase server she is in the process of posting them here....Look at those and please show me a faster nP/s screenshot from the dual k7.... Charles
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.