Author: Jay Urbanski
Date: 01:24:11 04/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
>The fastest thing I know of is generallry the executables on my ftp machine. >However, it is generally possible to make them faster, if you know the _exact_ >procssor that will be used. Unfortunately, all I deal with is unix so that I >can't compile windows versions here... Do you think you might ask whoever compiles the Windows executables to increase the number of CPUs to a more reasonable number? (I would suggest 16 at least :) This begs the question - is there any benefit to keeping the number low? I would think that once you get above one you have incurred whatever overhead you are going to have for an SMP version and you should just be able to pick the number of threads during runtime. Why limit the maximum?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.