Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 10:20:58 04/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 07, 2003 at 11:52:17, Bruce Moreland wrote: >On April 07, 2003 at 08:51:33, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>In a German forum I read the following reflection by Bruce Moreland, quote by >>heart: >> >>- or do you think that I, Bruce M., am responsible for the whole agitation in >>CCC, and NOT Chrilly D., the author of the private email? >> >> >>My answer is as follows: >> >>Yes, it is Bruce alone, who is responsible. 100% clear. >> >>[Repetitorium >> >>there's one single variation when it could have been necessary for Bruce to >>either or all together >> >>a making public the essentials of the email >> >>b deciding not to go to Graz >> >>c contascting a lawyer or other legal authorities >> >>d contact the same persons of c but on Chrilly's side >> >> >>if, and only if, the private emails contained a personally directed death threat >>against Bruce himself. Since that is not the case, the whole event is basically >>a very strange publication of private emails into CCC.] >> >> >> >>Rolf Tueschen >> >>P.S. In the same thread in CSS I read a statement of Prof. Althofer (Univ. of >>Jena) who said that someone with full power over his mental equipment would >>never have sent such private emails as those from Chrilly Donninger. I strongly >>disagree. And Althofer gives the arguments himself. He was even unable to only >>look at the pictures and stories about this war in the TV news so that he >>decided to ignore his TV for a couple of days, but Althofer has no understanding >>for someone who argues against this war itself. Isn't that inconsistent? Of >>course it is. And exactly in the same trap there is Bruce right now. > >You've posted this kind of stuff like ten times, and have essentially taken over >the thread. > >I quoted from emails I received, so that people could understand the content. I >did not reproduce the emails in whole, and I didn't post the images. I didn't >even say who had sent the emails. On the 27th I received another email, >essentially stating that the author hoped that the pictures would be distributed >further. > >If someone sends you an email, you are not bound by some legal and moral code to >refuse to reveal, even under threat of torture, that someone sent you an email. > >You are not doing anyone any good by repeating this stuff constantly. > >bruce Note that Tueschen is not only crazy but also wrongly quoting Althofer. Look who is number 349 to subscribe to this letter which was an anti-war petition: 349) Ingo Althofer, Jena, Germany Seemingly Tueschen is posting here just to get attention for himself. What the subject is and opinion of others and how well or wrong you quote them, it is not important for him. Wasn't CCC started to get rid of dudes like Tueschen? Note that the best thing is to ignore him. I just see he misquoted althofer because you quoted some of his posting. I do not read tueschen postings in principle. By accident sometimes i misclick but i quickly do a 'back' then in my browser. This guy should not try to get to Graz. He deserves same faith like Saddam. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.