Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 16:23:30 04/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2003 at 16:33:55, pavel wrote: >On April 08, 2003 at 08:37:10, Daniel Clausen wrote: > >>On April 08, 2003 at 07:32:47, pavel wrote: >> >>[snip] >> >>>You can't be a moderator, because the rules for being a moderator is that the >>>person has to be in good standing to be a moderator. >>> >>>ZRolf, you are definately not in good standing. >>> >>>pavs >> >>While chances of Rolf becoming a moderator of CCC are zero, maybe the term >>"being in good standing" should better be defined? Does it mean that >> >>-the majority of people 'like' you? (couldn't be measured) >>-no posts during the 6 months were moderated? >>-<insert anything here> >> >>Ok, that's more a rhetoric question I guess. :) >> >>Sargon (who prefers to know the definition of the terms being discussed before >>getting involved in the discussion) > >I guess the second reason seems reasonable. >Also you wouldn't nominate someone who goes telling everyone that I will sue you >(there has been several such cases in CTF). Hey you little kid, do you know that you are telling lies? - Actually I did never threaten someone to sue him. Never. > >I think Steve or the founding fathers of this forum can better define the term >"in good standing". > >Well Rolf's case is unique, one of the main reason this forum was created was to >escape from Rolf's wrath, even allowing him to be nominated would seem hilarious >to me. Since when kids decide if grown-ups are in good standings? It was Bruce who declared here that I am a member in good standings. Of course the German clique is still after me, but they can't find a case. I could be the best choice of a moderator because I am well equipped in logic which is different for many here. Kids included. People who can't read etc. People who tell lies. > >Just my 2 cents. > >pavs
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.