Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 16:48:54 04/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2003 at 15:37:40, Marc van Hal wrote: >On April 07, 2003 at 22:07:38, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On April 07, 2003 at 19:37:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2003 at 18:34:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>I think all of these people would be very good CCC moderators: >>>> >>>> Andrew Williams >>>> Bruce Moreland >>>> Charles Worthington >>>> Chessfun >>>> Dan Andersson >>>> Dieter Buerssner >>>> Kurt Utzinger >>>> Mike Byrne >>>> Russell Reagan >>>> Sally Weltrop >>>> Slater Wold >>>> Tony Hedlund >>>> Uri Blass >>>> >>>>Each of them seems fairly passionate about computer chess. >>>>Each of them seem to be highly intelligent and fairly frequent posters. >>>>Each of them seem to avoid adding fuel to the fire when a disruption erupts. >>> >>> >>> >>>Actually this is false in some cases. >>> >>>Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times. Wold is not >>>even a good interpreter. >>> >>>Could it be that a certain age could be of great help for such a job? Or a >>>certain family status? Meaning the lack of educational experience? >>> >>>Surely Bob Hyatt, Tony Hedlund, Ed Schroder, even me, could be highly qualified. >> >> >> >>Talking about educational experience, I think that taking the job would >>certainly have an impact on you and your future as a CCC poster. >> >>But I'm not saying that I wish that you get the job. :) >> >> >> >> Christophe >Why not he is as good as any other person >If you only select people because they belong to your group of friends they >should take of your vote. >Because that is voting without good sence! >It's better to look if they have something to contribute >And if they see and know how to handle when things get out of hand. >Which makes someone a good moderator. >So that does not mean oh I don't like that I warn you but I don't give a good >reason. >This is something wich is required for a good moderator. > >Marc Marc, you give a fantastic argument! I admire Christophe for his programming qualities, also his humour, but in giving good arguments I don't fear his participation. This is also the reason why I would never coose kids for such a job. I had a few exchanges with several people (young ones) and I saw that they have no understanding of the core of what I said. However with Bob or say Ed Schroder I never had a problem. That means: to be a mod you must at least have a complex understnasig of language. If not and - and now the most important - if you are basically authoritarian, I could give names but that would contradict the charta of CCC! - then someone misunderstands what you write and tells you to shut up. That looks foolish. Or take pavs - I only give his name because he's a mod in CTF! Pavs as a moderator came running and wrote that I were well known for being such and such. Adding a clear insult. His sole logic was to reply that he was NOT insulting me as a mod but as a noemal member. Know what I mean? I always thought that the insulting is the forbidden activity. Following pavs it is different. He thinks it is fair to insult if you take care that you don't insult as a moderator! ROFL I think it should be clear that you can't even discuss a thing with such kids. The same with your argument. Certain people here want to see the label "friend" on your name. And that label then allows people=friends to talk nonsense. s sNonsense from a friend is allowed. But good arguments from a non-friend are bad stuff by definition. This is logically outrageous. But certain people can't understand such details. So they are forced to look for the friend-label. But it is easy to see why such people are dangerous moderators. >> >> >> >>>Charles Worthington is really funny as a proposal. I never saw him post before. >>>And to me he sounds strange, when I read Worthington. It is too similar to Robin >>>Hood... :) >>> >>>You see what experience can help you!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.