Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: My picks for who would be a good moderator. Other suggestions?

Author: Rolf Tueschen

Date: 17:03:03 04/08/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 08, 2003 at 10:24:24, Slater Wold wrote:

>On April 07, 2003 at 19:37:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote:
>
>>On April 07, 2003 at 18:34:07, Dann Corbit wrote:
>>
>>>I think all of these people would be very good CCC moderators:
>>>
>>>	Andrew Williams
>>>	Bruce Moreland
>>>	Charles Worthington
>>>	Chessfun
>>>	Dan Andersson
>>>	Dieter Buerssner
>>>	Kurt Utzinger
>>>	Mike Byrne
>>>	Russell Reagan
>>>	Sally Weltrop
>>>	Slater Wold
>>>	Tony Hedlund
>>>	Uri Blass
>>>
>>>Each of them seems fairly passionate about computer chess.
>>>Each of them seem to be highly intelligent and fairly frequent posters.
>>>Each of them seem to avoid adding fuel to the fire when a disruption erupts.
>>
>>
>>
>>Actually this is false in some cases.
>>
>>Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times. Wold is not
>>even a good interpreter.
>
>Not a good interpreter?  What does that mean?
>
>LOL


Yes. I doubt that it's a reason to LOL. I have a good example. How could you be
a mod then?




>
>>Could it be that a certain age could be of great help for such a job? Or a
>>certain family status? Meaning the lack of educational experience?
>>
>>Surely Bob Hyatt, Tony Hedlund, Ed Schroder, even me, could be highly qualified.
>>Charles Worthington is really funny as a proposal. I never saw him post before.
>>And to me he sounds strange, when I read Worthington. It is too similar to Robin
>>Hood... :)
>>
>>You see what experience can help you!



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.