Author: Chessfun
Date: 19:18:13 04/08/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 08, 2003 at 19:58:29, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 07, 2003 at 22:42:58, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 07, 2003 at 19:37:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2003 at 18:34:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >>> >>>>I think all of these people would be very good CCC moderators: >>>> >>>> Andrew Williams >>>> Bruce Moreland >>>> Charles Worthington >>>> Chessfun >>>> Dan Andersson >>>> Dieter Buerssner >>>> Kurt Utzinger >>>> Mike Byrne >>>> Russell Reagan >>>> Sally Weltrop >>>> Slater Wold >>>> Tony Hedlund >>>> Uri Blass >>>> >>>>Each of them seems fairly passionate about computer chess. >>>>Each of them seem to be highly intelligent and fairly frequent posters. >>>>Each of them seem to avoid adding fuel to the fire when a disruption erupts. >>> >>> >>> >>>Actually this is false in some cases. >>> >>>Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times. Wold is not >>>even a good interpreter. >> >>Well Rolf you don't have to worry about me as I wouldn't run. But If I had ever >>run previously and was by some freak of nature elected you wouldn't be posting >>here. > > >That is exactly what I called friend-labelling. A very common misbehaviour. That >is basically not reacting on arguments but on the prejudice "friend". Either >someone has the label then he can tell you all he wants but IF he's without the >friend-label then you want to ban him, also if he's not telling any kind of >nonsense. Thanks for proving what I expected from you. As usual welcome !! >As I said in a past >discussion. You are a friend for many people because you make certain tests. >That is autoplayed games between engines. If I wanted I could do that all night >long. But only because I prefer to post arguments and not test results >certain people estimate me as an alien and have no bad conscience with such >irrational behaviour. You can label it what you want. But, note I have on record arguments with a few members aside from you and I wouldn't want any of them banned, well excluding Cummings in CTF but that's another story. Fact is my opinion of your posts are the vast majority are nothing more than trolls, as was this thread when you posted your comments into it, see it has nothing to do with your "Friend" labels. Sarah. >> >>Slater is a good choice, one I voted for once before. >> >>>Could it be that a certain age could be of great help for such a job? Or a >>>certain family status? Meaning the lack of educational experience? >>> >>>Surely Bob Hyatt, Tony Hedlund, Ed Schroder, even me, could be highly qualified. >> >>Oh indeed you're never "highly aggressive" or "negative at times". >> >>>Charles Worthington is really funny as a proposal. I never saw him post before. >> >>Guess that would mean you don't frequent this board enough, so maybe it would be >>better not to run even if nominated. >> >>>And to me he sounds strange, when I read Worthington. It is too similar to Robin >>>Hood... :) >>> >>>You see what experience can help you! >> >>Yes, since if you'd ever read any of his posts you'd know it was someone totally >>different. >> >>Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.