Author: Chessfun
Date: 05:19:14 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2003 at 08:03:22, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 08, 2003 at 22:18:13, Chessfun wrote: > >>You can label it what you want. But, note I have on record arguments with a few >>members aside from you and I wouldn't want any of them banned, well excluding >>Cummings in CTF but that's another story. Fact is my opinion of your posts are >>the vast majority are nothing more than trolls, as was this thread when you >>posted your comments into it, see it has nothing to do with your "Friend" >>labels. >> >>Sarah. > > >What you estimate as trolls are my thoughts. Let's examine your thoughts as first posted in this thread. I quote "Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times."....hmmm thought or troll....still looks like a troll to me. > Of course you can't cope with it >because you are occupied with transcribing autoplayed "test"-results which is >already a full-time job. NB I would NEVER blame you for your preferences, but in >your case where it's so obvious that you suck power out of *nothing* but you >hate everything else that you can't understand, I must insist on a >differentiated view on things. Or let me use your own vocabulary. Your posted >test-results are nothing but trolls with zero content. I am sorry. Yes indeed, little doubt you are right, to post test results is indeed a troll.!?. And they are clearly trolls to you as you have little interest in computer chess excluding of course critiquing others....or let's just say trolling ;-) <rest of troll snipped> Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.