Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 09:10:52 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2003 at 11:37:43, Steffen Basting wrote: >Hello! >While analysing some openings, the following position arose: > >[D] 5rkb/5p2/p2ppPp1/q5Pn/1r1BP3/1PN2Q2/1P5R/3R3K w - - 0 27 > >How long does your program need to find Rxh5!! which (probably) is better than >Ne2? Unfortunately, I don't know how much better it is because Ruffian 1.0.1 >needed 27 minutes on a PIV 3.06 to find this move without printing a PV which I >could follow... > >Thanks in advance, >Steffen CM9000 needs 10 seconds on my XP2400@2200. Time Depth Score Positions Moves 0:00 1/3 -0.09 2200 27.Be3 Qe5 28.Rg2 Rxb3 0:00 1/4 -0.29 7660 27.Be3 Rd8 28.Rhd2 Rxb3 0:00 1/4 0.09 20368 27.Ne2 Rb7 28.e5 d5 29.Rc1 0:00 1/5 -0.25 34349 27.Ne2 Qb5 28.Bc3 Rxb3 29.Rxd6 Qxg5 30.Rxa6 Qxf6 0:00 1/6 -0.23 78776 27.Ne2 Qb5 28.Nc3 Qb8 29.Bg1 Rxb3 30.Rhd2 0:00 1/7 -0.32 213659 27.Ne2 Qb5 28.Nc3 Qc6 29.Na2 Rb5 30.Rc1 0:03 1/8 0.00 838409 27.Ne2 Qb5 28.Be3 Qe5 29.Bd4 Qb5 0:06 1/9 -0.13 1701052 27.Ne2 Qb5 28.Bc3 Rxb3 29.Nd4 Rxc3 30.Qxc3 Qxg5 31.Nf3 Qxf6 32.Rxd6 Qxc3 33.bxc3 0:10 1/9 0.31 2868607 27.Rxh5 gxh5 28.Qxh5 Re8 29.Qh6 Rxd4 30.Rxd4 Qe5 31.Ne2 Rc8 32.g6 Qxf6 33.Qh7+ Kf8 34.Rxd6 0:18 1/10 0.42 5585748 27.Rxh5 gxh5 28.Qxh5 Rxd4 29.Rxd4 Bxf6 30.Nd5 Bd8 31.Rd1 exd5 32.g6 Kg7 33.Qh7+ Kf6 34.g7 Re8 35.Rf1+ Ke5 36.g8=Q Rxg8 37.Qxg8 dxe4 38.Qxf7 0:46 1/11 1.15 14856832 27.Rxh5 gxh5 28.Qxh5 Re8 29.e5 Rxd4 30.Rxd4 Qxe5 31.Rh4 Bxf6 32.gxf6 Qxf6 33.Ne4 Qxb2 34.Qg5+ Kf8 35.Nxd6 Qa1+ 36.Qg1 Qxg1+ 37.Kxg1 Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.