Author: margolies,marc
Date: 09:42:05 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
No mr taylor, you are not being discredited here. Mr therron is being discredited here and you ought to aplogize to HIM instead of attempting to erase your actions. At best your words are being challenged since we dont actually discuss or know you, but only judge you by what you say about others, which makes it interesting that you think this is about you instead of our respect of a great programmer. On April 09, 2003 at 04:23:58, stuart taylor wrote: >On April 08, 2003 at 23:39:43, Charles Worthington wrote: > >>On April 08, 2003 at 23:31:05, margolies,marc wrote: >> >>>perhaps you are not aware that your post seems to predicate that Mr therron's >>>program is second rate and that he might not be working hard enough? >>>Because you are a sophisticated and intelligent person,I am sure that you know >>>nicer ways to incentivize an answer to your questions which, in responding, >>>would not seem to validate your imbedded accusations. >> >> >>Ditto and I might also add that Mr. Theron's program has many times kicked my >>Deep Fritz 7 and dual 3.06 Xeons squarely in the behind on the chessbase server >>and I have the games (and bruises) to prove it. So my hat is off to him for a >>job well done and I have purchased both of his programs. :-) >> >>Charles > >I SAID it MIGHT yet be the strongest program if tested with enough games (but >only just). >But this thread had probably better be deleted quickly( requersted it to the >moderators, officially, but I do so here) as I seem to have worded it not as I >intended it to sound. >I understand Margoulises good explanation. >It turns out that I am thene being discredited here (but that's OK). But just >let it be deleted, and I hope that's good enough. And I appologise. >S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.