Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 12:07:25 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2003 at 10:49:20, Slater Wold wrote: >On April 08, 2003 at 20:03:03, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On April 08, 2003 at 10:24:24, Slater Wold wrote: >> >>>On April 07, 2003 at 19:37:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>> >>>>On April 07, 2003 at 18:34:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>> >>>>>I think all of these people would be very good CCC moderators: >>>>> >>>>> Andrew Williams >>>>> Bruce Moreland >>>>> Charles Worthington >>>>> Chessfun >>>>> Dan Andersson >>>>> Dieter Buerssner >>>>> Kurt Utzinger >>>>> Mike Byrne >>>>> Russell Reagan >>>>> Sally Weltrop >>>>> Slater Wold >>>>> Tony Hedlund >>>>> Uri Blass >>>>> >>>>>Each of them seems fairly passionate about computer chess. >>>>>Each of them seem to be highly intelligent and fairly frequent posters. >>>>>Each of them seem to avoid adding fuel to the fire when a disruption erupts. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Actually this is false in some cases. >>>> >>>>Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times. Wold is not >>>>even a good interpreter. >>> >>>Not a good interpreter? What does that mean? >>> >>>LOL >> >> >>Yes. I doubt that it's a reason to LOL. I have a good example. How could you be >>a mod then? >> > >#1 - I was being a smartass. > >#2 - If you have any 'examples' from CCC, then please show me. But if we're >talking about CTF, you've got nothing. > >But by all means, share. Please. If you promise to refuse to be a moderator because of the shown deficiences. Ok?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.