Author: Keith Evans
Date: 12:31:15 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2003 at 15:07:25, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 09, 2003 at 10:49:20, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On April 08, 2003 at 20:03:03, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 08, 2003 at 10:24:24, Slater Wold wrote: >>> >>>>On April 07, 2003 at 19:37:02, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On April 07, 2003 at 18:34:07, Dann Corbit wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>I think all of these people would be very good CCC moderators: >>>>>> >>>>>> Andrew Williams >>>>>> Bruce Moreland >>>>>> Charles Worthington >>>>>> Chessfun >>>>>> Dan Andersson >>>>>> Dieter Buerssner >>>>>> Kurt Utzinger >>>>>> Mike Byrne >>>>>> Russell Reagan >>>>>> Sally Weltrop >>>>>> Slater Wold >>>>>> Tony Hedlund >>>>>> Uri Blass >>>>>> >>>>>>Each of them seems fairly passionate about computer chess. >>>>>>Each of them seem to be highly intelligent and fairly frequent posters. >>>>>>Each of them seem to avoid adding fuel to the fire when a disruption erupts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Actually this is false in some cases. >>>>> >>>>>Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times. Wold is not >>>>>even a good interpreter. >>>> >>>>Not a good interpreter? What does that mean? >>>> >>>>LOL >>> >>> >>>Yes. I doubt that it's a reason to LOL. I have a good example. How could you be >>>a mod then? >>> >> >>#1 - I was being a smartass. >> >>#2 - If you have any 'examples' from CCC, then please show me. But if we're >>talking about CTF, you've got nothing. >> >>But by all means, share. Please. > > >If you promise to refuse to be a moderator because of the shown deficiences. Ok? If you don't want this thread to go on forever, then you would be best to let the voters decide if you made a case.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.