Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 12:41:33 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2003 at 15:32:58, Charles Worthington wrote: >On April 09, 2003 at 14:28:03, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On April 09, 2003 at 11:52:48, Charles Worthington wrote: >> >>>I ran the Deepfritzmark and Shreddermark tests with hyperthreading disabled then >>>enabled with some very confusing results that I am hoping someone can help >>>explain: >>> >>>Test set #1 Hyperthreading Disabled, 64MB Hash, Engine Parameters @ default >>> >>>Shredder 7.04: Shreddermark: 2227 +- 0 (1.5s) 705kN/s >>> >>>Deep Fritz 7 : Deepfritzmark: 2724 +- 44 (3.1s) 2252kN/s >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>Test set #2 Hyperthreading Enabled, 64MB Hash, Engine Parameters @ Default >>> >>>Shredder 7.04: Shreddermark: 2227 +- 0 (1.5s) 803kN/s >>> >>>Deep Fritz 7 : Deepfritzmark: 2476 +- 0 (3.2s) 2555kN/s >>> >>> >>> >>>Test set #3: Hyperthreading Enabled, 32 MB Hash, Engine Parameters @ Default >>> >>>Shredder 7.04: Shreddermark: 2784 +- 0 (0.4s) 907kN/s >>> >>>Deep Fritz 7: Deepfritzmark: 2476 +- 0 (3.4s) 2532kN/s >>> >>> >>> >>>Test set #4; Hyperthreading enabled, 16MB Hash, engine parameters @ default >>> >>>Shredder 7.04; Shreddermark: 2784 +- 0 (0.4s) 1008kN/s >>> >>>Deep fritz 7: Deepfritzmark: 2476 +- 0 (4.5s) 2544 kN/s >>> >>> >>> >>>This is somewhat confusing as Fritz scored the highest fritzmark with >>>hyperthreading_disabled_ even though his kN/s were_far_lower. Shredder scored >>>far better with it_enabled_ both in result, speed, and time to solution. >>>Also Shredder seemed to benefit more from the smaller hash sizes where Fritz >>>seemed relatively worsened by them. Does anyone have any insight as to these >>>seemingly contradictory results? And would I be better to run Deep Fritz with >>>the hyperthreading diasabled even though his kN/s is considerably lower? >>> >>>Charles >> >>Im not surprised. >> >>You can get a lower Fritzmark although your Computer is faster and has higher >>kN/s values. The Fritzmark is not linear. >>This seems to be complete Nonsense. >> >>In addition they changed the Fritzmark ratings arbitrarily with the release of >>Fritz 7 because the kN/s were smaller in the new versions of Fritz. >> >>You should use the Crafty Benchmark because the results are far more reliable. >>A Crafty Benchmark is for example used in the famous SPEC CPU 2000 benchmark. >> >>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/CINT2000/ >> >> >>This seems to be the only important Testposition for Fritzmark: >> >>[D]1r5r/3b1pk1/p2p1np1/p1qPp3/2N1PbP1/2P2PN1/1PB1Q1K1/R3R3 b - - 0 1 >> >>The time it takes till the engine reaches the end of ply 10 is measured. >> >>When you start the Test three positions are evaluated up to ply 6: >> >>[D] 1q2r3/2p1bpkp/5np1/8/5B1P/5QNK/3P1PP1/R7 w - - 0 1 >> >>[D] r1b2rk1/1p2bppp/p4n2/4B3/1qBR4/2N5/P3QPPP/R5K1 w - - 0 1 >> >>[D] r4rk1/5p2/p1b1pQpq/8/1B2P3/2NR4/PPP3PP/1K6 w - - 0 1 >> >>Michael > > >Michael Crafty 19.3 is showing one cpu only in the dos window. how do i get it >to recognize all 4 threads for the test? You should ask Bob. Maybe you need a Crafty.rc file like this one: ansi off adaptive 1.2M 12M 192M 3M 48M log off smpmt 4 book on book random 1 book width 5 tbpath C:\chessbase\TB\ cache 8m learn 7 ponder on swindle off time cpu exit
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.