Author: Marc van Hal
Date: 13:22:56 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2003 at 08:19:14, Chessfun wrote: >On April 09, 2003 at 08:03:22, Rolf Tueschen wrote: > >>On April 08, 2003 at 22:18:13, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>You can label it what you want. But, note I have on record arguments with a few >>>members aside from you and I wouldn't want any of them banned, well excluding >>>Cummings in CTF but that's another story. Fact is my opinion of your posts are >>>the vast majority are nothing more than trolls, as was this thread when you >>>posted your comments into it, see it has nothing to do with your "Friend" >>>labels. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >> >>What you estimate as trolls are my thoughts. > >Let's examine your thoughts as first posted in this thread. I quote "Chessfun >and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times."....hmmm thought or >troll....still looks like a troll to me. > >> Of course you can't cope with it >>because you are occupied with transcribing autoplayed "test"-results which is >>already a full-time job. NB I would NEVER blame you for your preferences, but in >>your case where it's so obvious that you suck power out of *nothing* but you >>hate everything else that you can't understand, I must insist on a >>differentiated view on things. Or let me use your own vocabulary. Your posted >>test-results are nothing but trolls with zero content. I am sorry. > > >Yes indeed, little doubt you are right, to post test results is indeed a >troll.!?. And they are clearly trolls to you as you have little interest in >computer chess excluding of course critiquing others....or let's just say >trolling ;-) > > ><rest of troll snipped> > >Sarah. Question what is trolling acording both of you? Or better what is the difference between trolling and a discusion? Marc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.