Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:57:10 04/09/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2003 at 15:31:38, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On April 09, 2003 at 08:19:14, Chessfun wrote: > >>On April 09, 2003 at 08:03:22, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >> >>>On April 08, 2003 at 22:18:13, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>You can label it what you want. But, note I have on record arguments with a few >>>>members aside from you and I wouldn't want any of them banned, well excluding >>>>Cummings in CTF but that's another story. Fact is my opinion of your posts are >>>>the vast majority are nothing more than trolls, as was this thread when you >>>>posted your comments into it, see it has nothing to do with your "Friend" >>>>labels. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>> >>>What you estimate as trolls are my thoughts. >> >>Let's examine your thoughts as first posted in this thread. I quote "Chessfun >>and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times."....hmmm thought or >>troll....still looks like a troll to me. > > >Two points. You see, again I begin to think! Look, how that works... :) > >1) The topic here is not about CC. CC = Computer Chess, yes I see you're thinking ! >2) But still I showed my usual class and gave a true copy of my memory. And then >I wrote simply the truth. Tough for you if you see yourself different. If a true copy of your memory is simply saying "Chessfun and Reagan are highly aggressive and negative at times." then I'd suggest the following URL http://memory.kingshill-research.org/aids/ ;-) >>Yes indeed, little doubt you are right, to post test results is indeed a >>troll.!?. > > >Third point... You must learn to read. Very important. >Testresults trolls? Not automatically. But in your case yes. In your case any post becomes a troll at least it would seem I'm a little more selective about the subject matter ! ;-) >Interesting that you avoided to doubt my diagnosis of your aggressivity. I knew >that you knew it. Why on earth would I doubt anything you have to say Rolf?. I find more interesting the fact you define your posts as thoughts rather than trolls and something you write as a diagnosis?. >>And they are clearly trolls to you as you have little interest in >>computer chess excluding of course critiquing others....or let's just say >>trolling ;-) > > >Good example for your limitations. No wonder you can't follow me. If I can't follow you why continue trolling! >4.) I have big interest in CC. I play MYSELF against the progs/ engines, while >you only copy and past the results from your automatic games eng - eng. Yes indeed, I've read many of your posts concerning these games you play against programs as I'm sure many others have. You are >not interested in CC. You like to play model railway. But that is not chess. Er, small correction computer "chess". >What you do, yes, is complete nonsense. Without a reasonable sense. What you do >is already done by SSDF. Sorry over there... :) I see redundancy for miles >around. Of course without validity. Apart from these aspects I like SSDF very >much. What you do Rolfie is simply critique, not much to that. Trolls described as interest? >5.) You say that I have no interest in CC but I like the critic against others. >In a way you are correct. I have no interest in YOUR version of CC! I have only >interest in CC on a complex level Trolling Rolf isn't complex, we all can do it ! or..... > and this level starts with critical reflections. I think you miss typed cynical?....or.....;-) Without critics you can't approach such a field as CC which is part >of chess and even has academic roots. However what you do is counting marbles of >different colors. :) Cool I count marbles and then your here to tell me I'm not counting marbles properly?, seems like an odd waste of time for both of us. >I see no obstacle why we couldn't become friends. But you should tame your >aggressions. As you already said "you hate everything else that you can't understand". Again maybe pity would have been a better word than "hate" however believe me it's a big obstacle. >I am helpless against aggressive women. I think again you must have meant clueless.....Clearly. > Do you want to learn chess? >Let's play some games. Isn't that what you think you're already doing?....why do you call a troll a game?. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.