Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: FINAL results Nunn test Hiarcs - CST

Author: Moritz Berger

Date: 01:58:51 10/11/98

Go up one level in this thread


My advice:

1) Just *count* the number of excuses needed to cover up CST's performance.

2) *List* the number of conditions that are declared unfavourable for CST in
hindsight.

3) *Compare* with performance of "real" chess programs

4) *Try* it out yourself on ICC - play against Lonnie with the latest CST/Win95
beta and extend lists 1) and 2).

5) *Communicate* with the CSTal team on r.g.c.c. - or look up their history on
DejaNews.

6) *Read* the advertising on www.oxford-softworks.com and try to establish a
logical connection with this and the known facts about and games played by the
program.


Doing 1)-6) is better than continuing the debate on CCC, KIP is perfectly right
when he points to the fact that CST is not represented here by its authors.


Moritz



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.