Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 08:04:42 04/10/03
Go up one level in this thread
On April 10, 2003 at 10:27:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On April 10, 2003 at 10:11:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote: > >>On April 10, 2003 at 09:25:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On April 10, 2003 at 09:20:15, ERIQ wrote: >>> >>>>These are all great goals, but I like this order better. >>>> >>>> >>>>* A Linux/bsd version of Chess Tiger w/ great gui ie. Eboard or better. >>>>* A native ARM version of Chess Tiger for Palm >>>>* Chess Tiger 16 >>>>* ...and a few more projects that I prefer to keep secret >>>> >>>>basis for order is: >>>> >>>>1.I will have a freebsd system running in about two week hopefully (just waiting >>>>on hardware to arrive) >>>> >>>>2.As soon as I could buy a new sony palm I will. So I can win a game from time >>>>to time :) >>>> >>>>3.And ct16 should be last because ct15 is already too strong!! whether it's >>>>first or last on that silly list that everone likes, I can't beat it on a 486 >>>>comp. And yes I've tried shamlessly >>>> >>>>Just my two cents. >>>> >>>> Sign, >>>> Eriq >>> >>>a dual version of CT15 would kick more butt than ct16 or working at the unknown >>>freebsd. note that freebsd allows multiprocessing but multithreading at it i >>>cannot advice. >> >>I think a dual version of CTX would be great! maybe we should have a hands up >>here, to see if we can influence the order of things ;) (note: people with dual >>processor systems votes count double, ok maybe only 1.7 :) >> >>Jonas > >Some people are simply too lazy or have too much bugs in their software to get >stuff parallel well to work. > >It will be always like that. Why don't you just fix them???
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.