Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: To christophe theron regarding ct.

Author: Jonas Bylund

Date: 09:05:35 04/10/03

Go up one level in this thread


On April 10, 2003 at 12:02:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On April 10, 2003 at 11:37:50, Jonas Bylund wrote:
>
>>On April 10, 2003 at 10:27:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>
>>>On April 10, 2003 at 10:11:21, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>>
>>>>On April 10, 2003 at 09:25:09, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On April 10, 2003 at 09:20:15, ERIQ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>These are all great goals, but I like this order better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>* A Linux/bsd version of Chess Tiger w/ great gui ie. Eboard or better.
>>>>>>* A native ARM version of Chess Tiger for Palm
>>>>>>* Chess Tiger 16
>>>>>>* ...and a few more projects that I prefer to keep secret
>>>>>>
>>>>>>basis for order is:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>1.I will have a freebsd system running in about two week hopefully (just waiting
>>>>>>on hardware to arrive)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>2.As soon as I could buy a new sony palm I will. So I can win a game from time
>>>>>>to time :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>3.And ct16 should be last because ct15 is already too strong!! whether it's
>>>>>>first or last on that silly list that everone likes, I can't beat it on a 486
>>>>>>comp. And yes I've tried shamlessly
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just my two cents.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Sign,
>>>>>>     Eriq
>>>>>
>>>>>a dual version of CT15 would kick more butt than ct16 or working at the unknown
>>>>>freebsd. note that freebsd allows multiprocessing but multithreading at it i
>>>>>cannot advice.
>>>>
>>>>I think a dual version of CTX would be great! maybe we should have a hands up
>>>>here, to see if we can influence the order of things ;) (note: people with dual
>>>>processor systems votes count double, ok maybe only 1.7 :)
>>>>
>>>>Jonas
>>>
>>>Some people are simply too lazy or have too much bugs in their software to get
>>>stuff parallel well to work.
>>>
>>>It will be always like that.
>>
>>Well i don't know where that came from, but i am quite sure that an accomplished
>>programmer like CT would have no problems making Tiger SMP.
>
>in which case he is just plain lazy now.

I think the fact that he have expressed other priorities than SMP is more
accurate than your guessing, maybe you are too lazy to ask him yourself?

Jonas



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.